tayarx.blogg.se

Silica crystals
Silica crystals









silica crystals

Upon recognition of crystals, macrophage surface receptors transmit signal 1 and/or 2. Subsequently, active caspase-1 processes pro-IL-1β to mature IL-1β, which is then released into the extracellular environment through damaged membranes of dying macrophages (Figure 1). The second signal (signal 2) stimulates the assembly of a complex of multiple proteins including NLRP3, ASC, and pro-caspase-1, resulting in the activation of caspase-1. The first signal (signal 1) is mediated via pathogen-associated molecular patterns, damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), or cytokines that trigger nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB)-mediated upregulation of NLRP3 along with pro-IL-1β (Figure 1).

silica crystals

Briefly, at least two signals are required for the activation of NLRP3 inflammasome. The molecular mechanism for inflammasome activation has been extensively studied and is well summarized in several recent reviews ( 6, 13– 15). Likewise, various crystals such as MSU, hydroxyapatite, cholesterol, and alum crystals, and nanomaterials such as TiO 2 nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have also been reported to induce NLRP3 inflammasome activation in macrophages ( 7, 9– 12). Recent studies have revealed that silica and asbestos induce IL-1β secretion via NLRP3 inflammasome activation in macrophages ( 6– 8). Although the underlying mechanism was unclear, this process was referred to as “frustrated phagocytosis” and was implicated in the pathogenesis of inflammatory diseases such as fibrosis and cancer ( 5). These early studies showed that upon phagocytosis, crystals are not digested but instead cause lysosomal damage. Phagocytosis of crystals such as silica, asbestos, monosodium urate (MSU), and hydroxyapatite by macrophages was initially observed by electron microscopy about 40 years ago ( 1– 4). This review focuses on the mechanisms by which macrophages recognize crystals and nanoparticles. Alternatively, a model for receptor-independent phagocytosis of crystals has also been proposed. Several recent studies have reported that some crystal particles are negatively charged and are recognized by scavenger receptor family members in a charge-dependent manner. However, it is unlikely that macrophages have evolutionally acquired receptors specific for crystals or recently emerged nanoparticles. Therefore, it is important to understand how macrophages recognize crystals. These crystal-associated-inflammatory diseases are triggered by the macrophage NLRP3 inflammasome activation and cell death. Endogenous crystals such as monosodium urate, cholesterol, and hydroxyapatite are associated with pathogenesis of gout, atherosclerosis, and osteoarthritis, respectively. Inhalation of exogenous crystals such as silica, asbestos, and carbon nanotubes can cause lung fibrosis and cancer.

silica crystals

  • 2PRESTO, Japan Science and Technology Agency, Kawaguchi, Japan.
  • 1Frontier Research Institute for Interdisciplinary Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
  • The zebrafish model of silicosis developed here shed light onto the molecular mechanisms involved in the activation of the immune system by silica crystals. In addition, Cxcl8a/Cxcr2-dependent recruitment of myeloid cells to silica crystals was required to promote emergency myelopoiesis and systemic inflammation. Genetic and pharmacological analysis revealed that the Nlrp3 inflammasome regulated silica crystal-induced inflammation and pyroptotic cell death, but not emergency myelopoiesis. We report here that injection of silica crystals into the hindbrain ventricle of zebrafish embryos led to the initiation of local and systemic immune responses driven through both Toll-like receptors (TLR)- and inflammasome-dependent signaling pathways, followed by induction of pro-fibrotic markers. Silica crystals are potent activators of the inflammasome that cause a fibrotic lung disease, called silicosis, with no effective treatment available.











    Silica crystals